Finally, UPSC has declared the result for CSAT-prelim-2013 (for both IAS and IFS). Earlier The result system was= you enter your roll number and the UPSC website would tell you whether you’ve passed or not. But this time, UPSC adopted the desi method (uploaded PDF file that contains big list of roll numbers)
I’m uploading the same PDF files on google docs (because UPSC server will become slow as hell for a few days). click on the following links:
- Result: IAS/IPS/Civil Service candidates: click me to see resultĀ (~15000 selected)
- Result: IFS candidates: click me to see resultĀ (~1000 selected)
- Forgot roll number?Click me but you’ll need registration id
@Those who didnāt qualify
Try again next year with full strength, rectifying whatever shortcomings you had in your preparation. And if this was your last attempt, then my best wishes for all your future endeavors.
Back in 2010, a lady from Chennai committed suicide for failing in prelims, Even in CSE-2012 a guy from Banglore committed suicide. Please remember that setbacks and success will come but life is more precious than one exam, government job, girlfriend, boyfriend or (temporary) nagging of parents/relatives.
I take the liberty of copy pasting a few paragraphs from Mr.Tirumala’s blogspot:
//Start of copypaste//
When I started (UPSC preparation), I always dreamt about what I would do once I am a civil servant. I failed the first time. Thatās when things changed. Thereafter, I was more concerned about how to clear this exam than about what I would do once I become a civil servant. The question as to āwhyā I wanted to be a civil servant was relegated to some back corner of my mind. It was the exam and it was me. Years rolled by. Until this happened. I was too old for this exam and out of attempts.
(So) I am back in industry. My career is progressing well. Biwi and baby are fine. Life has changed. Priorities have changed. And I am moving on.
The job, the workload, project deadlines, cafeteria, cubicle, bitching about the HR policies and the wait for the next weekend. Itās all there. However, thereās one difference. I had the courage to risk it all. I once did. I lost the bet. And I know that I have the courage to build my dreams once more. Brick by brick, I will build. I believe this is my takeaway from this exam, where I didnāt, āqualifyā…….I spent a lot of time wondering why I didnāt make it to civil services. I thought I will carry the burden of this failure all my life and will never get over this….Thatās not so. I moved on, (and) quite well to my own surprise, I must say. In retrospect it looks so stupid of me to even think that I failed. I now look back with a smile…It must have been fun while it lasted. I now work in the field of aerospace with one of the biggest aeroplane makers in world, and I am proud to be an engineer.
-Tirumala
//end of copypaste//
@Those who qualified in CSAT 2013
Congratulations. What next?= Youāll have to fill up a separate form for the mains examination known as DAF (Detailed application form)
It will be an online application form, you fill it up, take printout and post it to UPSC, New Delhi along with photocopies of necessary documents and fees.
| What? |
IAS/Civil Service |
IFS (Forest service) |
| UPSC will upload DAF form on | 20 August | 3 August |
| Last date to fill online DAF form | 10 Sept. | 20 August |
| last date to send printed DAF form to UPSC | 18 Sept. | 30 August |
| mains starts from | 1st December | 3rd October |
| hallticket and Mains time-table | 2-3 weeks before exam | 2-3 weeks before exam |
For any doubts call the helpline of UPSC: 011-23385271, 011-23098543 or 011-23381125
By the way, Result of Roll Nos.290376, 722998 and 783890 have been withheld on Court direction.
![[Result] UPSC Prelims-2021: Lowest Number of candidates cleared for Mains in last 8 years, result declared in 19 days!](https://mrunal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/csp20-result20-c-500x383.jpg)
![[Admission] UPSC 2021: Mrunalās Full Length Economy Course with theory, contemporary issues, latest budget, survey- 10% discount promocode āmrunal.orgā](https://mrunal.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/promo-6-month-horizont-2020-12-500x383.png)
![[Download] Disha’s Annual Current Affairs Compilation 2020 for FREE!](https://mrunal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/disha-annual-ca-2020-c-500x383.gif)
Ish preparing hamesa dhyan se aur nisana hamesa machli ki ankh pr hi lgana h aisa krne se zarur saflta milegi aur health ka bhi khyal rkhna pardta h gud bye dears
ye to sahi hai par ias ka main paper hamesa aashan nhi hota hai par main exam ki date kab se ho rehe hai tell me nown
IIM A, former 100%iler. Got 200 in Paper 2 and 150 in Paper 1. As per arguments here, I should not be selected. Thankfully UPSC does not think so. If aptitude is there, knowledge is easy to come by. Spending 6 months reading in prep time does not mean you will do that for the rest of your life, aptitude allows you to process info for the rest of your life. In my opinion Paper 1 need not be there in prelims.
@ and you should be made prime minister of India.
u r over qualified for the post so u should be made as both prime minister and chief minister of ur state….
Yes, knowledge is easy to come by for superhuman like you but where will you buy wisdom?
Kota ki galiyo me, ke Rajender Nagar/Mukherji Nagar ke chauraho pe?
It’s not a job of superdurable (for life) and superhuan information processor.
We don’t need Dr. Sheldon Coopers here.
@ Neena, I need you here to smack this guy hard.
@ Parek
Really impressed by your performance. Double congrats for you ‘double’ i.e. two top scores. But i think a better place for your super brains could have been a quantum physics lab or a research project on mathematical flaws underlying those fashionable financial derivatives which led to global financial crisis. An administrator’s job is a typical generalists’ job. Gonna be boring for you, i guess. We would have loved to see you innovating for the country or for the whole world in the global interest. Anyway, its completely your choice. Go ahead with what you find best for you.
ATB…
100 percentile and then perfect 200 sounds superlative. Someone pinch me that i’m writing to and expecting a reply from a paranormal creature. Pun intended !!
;-)
how did u become so confident that not a single question of decision making in csat could be wrong..Are u such an excellent decision maker…if u r..then at least ur decision to join civil services is wrong..it is for mediocre people like us..u please assist ISRO and/or NASA…they are deprived of rare creatures like you…
Hey, I am not you!
mediocre huh!! no wonder the mediocrity of the bureaucracy is the only permanent feature in our country…
You are not UPSC so you dont get to decide who is making the right decision and who is not… Hell!! even UPSC is not the authority to do so…
Instead of being envious i suggest that you use the time well, you have a whole year ahead of you… and get to Parek’s level 150 in GS Paper 1 or TRY to reach that level, else be happy being a mediocre and trashing worthwhile candidates…
Though i qualified prelims i had 280 in total..180 in p2 and 1oo in p1 therefore nothing like being envious…nor i hv need to try to reach that level.and i never number myself among self proclaimed Einsteins.WHATEVER i got and i will get , will depend upon my hardwork in right direction.A mediocre here means the one who always strives to learn, simply because he/she avoids getting unnecessary pride to intrude the cognition.And within 3 months of preparation 75 question correct is doubtful.
replace 3 by 6 it is general studies by UPSC… here 50+ correct questions is a decent score. some of my friends are exceptionally wonderful in GS they are getting not more than 130..150 is not impossible but also not so easy…even if one gets then should avoid showcasing unnecessary.
Hey buddy even this score you are projecting is just not happening, 180 in gs 2 and 100 in gs 1.
I mean why do we always see fakes dominating such forums, That asshole earlier was saying that he got 200 and 150 respectively. And I’m just dumber now to have read and answered you guys.
Do you guys have any idea what does it take to score a 100 in gs 1, I really want to know how long had you been preparing, whether this is your first attempt,
Why don’t you guys actually write something that makes sense,
And for all who are actual aspirants, Please don’t believe these assholes for a second, Just work hard and keep moving forward
and the real game is mains where one needs much more than aptitude to sail through…all the best to all…
Administration requires much more than aptitude. Your suggestion to do away with paper 1 in prelim shows how much opaque, your aptitude has made you. What if zoology replaces paper 1? How your IIM percentile gonna help then? And my dear upsc generally have over 1000 vacancies. Of course, one is reserved for you, who will fill the rest?
now this is something i can get behind fully… administration is different from aptitude… but it has a component of experience and people without aptitude for administration would be terrible in an administrative job…
@Parek’s comment on paper 1 was misplaced… knowing at least a little about almost everything is as important as knowing a lot about at least one thing…
dear tell us also technique to get atleast 199 in 2nd paper
u have no right to say like this in my openion if u feel rest other peoples also wants to feel rest and they want csat . after some time u will be started to say even examination of civil services is wrong in india, so don’t be over confident dude u can slip
You definitely might have prepared for CAT at least 10 months. That is purely related to paper II. Then what is the difference between you and others who struggles in Paper II ( with rural background)…
Regards,
Naveen
In reply to everyone – I was only talking about those candidates who read only during the prep time and then forget the habit immediately after that. UPSC should focus on finding people who have the right aptitude and attitude for learning. i am not saying the current method is perfect but as it is, it gives advantage to people who can spend 6 months of their life devoted to this while disadvantaging those who genuinely have a superior aptitude and attitude towards knowledge. As for mediocrity and the right place for excellence, let me be the judge of that please. Even if someone was a genius, it is not necessary that he/she an put the ability to use only in NASA. Please. I have not claimed that my scores are an achievement, I feel 150 should be a below par score when competing against the best in the country.
@ Parek
first of all i highly doubt your GS1 score of 150…i believe that even a very serious candidate, with calculated guesswork could go upto to 110-120…but if someone crosses that score it is almost certain that he/she went for a lot of wild guesses(this shows the candidate’s level of insecurity inside as he/she lacks confidence in his/her abilities)…or it can be sheer luck that u had somehow read about some questions at some point of time in your childhood etc…or both…if u actually think 150 is a below par score in p1 (by any standards) then i think either u are lying about ur score OR ur score is the result of guesswork and luck.
overall i can make out that u havent really put in much effort in preparation for this exam and that u are a very insecure person…correct me if i am wrong…
ok..enough gyaan…now straight to the point…
Why GS is important ? – GS gives u an opprtunity to read about several subjects and know about ur country – the country you wish to serve throughout ur life…reading about the Indian Constitution, History, Economics and other current affairs serves 2 purposes…one it makes u proud of ur country…and secondly it opens up your mind and broadens ur thinking…it makes us capable of analysing various happenings around us…
Being extremely vast in syllabus/scope, preparation for GS indirectly helps develop qualities such as patience, confidence, resilience, enduring ambiguity, stress management etc…In short it is more like a personality development course, and not a blind pursuit…this is, i guess, the rationale behind keeping such a huge syllabus for this exam (a friend of mine with pub ad optional said that some committe formed by the govt long ago had said this exact same thing)…
So the fact that u suggested the removal of paper1 clearly shows that u dont know much about this exam , and have never wondered why it is structured as a curriculum heavy exam…
Removing paper1 would make the knowledge of the Indian Constitution otiose…Does that not seem like a preposterous idea to u ?? An IAS officer even without the knowledge of the fundamental rights of thousands of citizens affected by his work ??
Aptitude paper – i believe this paper is there to test ur reasoning , logical skills etc…i agree that these should be present in not only civil service aspirants but in every Indian…after all 1 of our fundam duties is to develop scientific temper – which is somewhat related to reasoning etc…
But, overall between GS and aptitude –> Both should get a balanced treatment , or GS should get a “slightly” upper hand considering its purpose…
Aptitude is something that improves with practice, and goes away when u lose touch…But the personality u develop during GS prep stays with u forever…
u say that there is no guarantee that a person will keep learning after preparation ( and so ppl with good aptitude for learning should be selected)…u dont see the flaw in ur argument ?? My friend, Can u give me a guarantee that a person with high aptitude will learn later , if selected ??
u say – ” Spending 6 months reading in prep time does not mean you will do that for the rest of your life”…true…but having a strong aptitude also does not guarantee it…
u say that the current form of exam gives an advantage of ppl who devote 6 months to study…i think the debate was on the exact opposite statement – that the current form gives an advantage to those scoring 90-95 % in apti paper, and puts those who have put in months of hard work at a disadvantaged position…again – pls correct me if i am wrong…(atleast we should be sure about the topic of the debate…or else all this blabbering would be in vain)
the fact that aptitude is subordinate to GS is reflected in the new mains pattern itself – 4 GS papers and no aptitude paper…i guess u would suggest 4 apti papers and no GS paper instead, wont u ??
it is upsc that must decide what is a more important requirement – GS or aptitude, or whether both are equal…Now , even though we have both papers of equal marks (200), the exam has somehow developed an inclination towards aptitude…
and if it decides that aptitude is more important, then a paper of aptitude should also be there in Mains – as this stage decides who will finally become a civil servant…
@Parek
sale tune CAMBRIDGE se bi MBA ki hoti tab bi Paper 2 mai tere 200 ni aate !
bewakoof dusre ko banaioo …sala rattu tota !
hey parek, ppl doubt u a lot. u just post bur roll number and birth date and let them see through there own eyes. then they will believe. just show them that u r right. waiting to see ur post… pls post ur roll no n bod.
Read the statement by Additional Secretary (UPSC) R.K. Gupta to Member of Parliament Avinash Pande. http://www.fightupsc.com/upsc-statement.html
UPSC says no to anymore attempts after the expiry of those naturally accruing to us. But people have contacted a number of MPs (such as Sharad Yadav, Rajnath Singh and many more from south India) and the matter may be soon raised in the parliament in the monsoon session itself. They have talked to the SC lawyers who are saying that there are 99% chances of winning at least 2 more attempts (as three more attempts were given when the syllabus was changed in 1979).
There is no point living in fool’s paradise. yet the logic given by team Tanmay has strength. For more log on to http://www.fightupsc.com.
Most important of all, register yourselves at the site (as both the court as well as the parliament recognises majority)
@rajan first of all the change is not minor-it is a major change, for example Pali language was dropped. so such people have no choice between optionals at mains level.CSAT itself was a major change(but nobody raised a voice).Introduction of fresh paper in mains. Such changes have adverse effect for student caught in transition, they have been treated unequally, hence violation of Article 16 Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment.
Dear Satan, I am in complete agreement with you. But, in case you really feel that injustice has been meted out to candidates who are trapped in ‘transition’, try to advertise this as much as you can, and get yourself and others registered at the site mentioned above.
I repeat, both the court and the parliament recognizes majority.
all the best….
you are not going to be stopped from applying because of your caste, race, place of birth etc… that is what is equality of opportunity… if you cant utilize the opportunity, you dont prepare well, and worst you keep blaming UPSC for every reform made, I dont think constitution would protect you…
You cant begin by saying i am bad at english or i suck at maths… i can always say i am bad at history, these excuses would only fly with people who are myopic and those who crib…
and as the reply says, the changes made are not MAJOR… UPSC is not going to give extra chances
Dear friends,i am an unfortunate candidate who is a victim of this repeated pattern changes. I failed in prelims in my first two attempts in 2007 and 2008. but subsequently i wrote mains in my 3rd and 4th attempt in 2009 and 2010. but after the advent of CSAT i repeatedly got disqualified in prelims my last two attempts in 2011 and 2012. as i belong to OBC category, i preserved my 7th and last attempt for 2014 and skipped this year exam.As i am poor in math as well as in English,the CSAT has just become a bane for me.(and like many students like me).In my last appearance in mains 2010,my marks fell shortage of just 6 marks from the cut-off for interview. and now my repeated failure in prelim stage has put me into depression.Isnt illogical to bring a new pattern without safeguarding the interest of the students who have already exhausted their earlier attempts in preparing in a different way for years?? I have written a no of letters to UPSC and the GOVT regarding the disadvantage we suffer and to provide relaxation in both age and no of attempts to all categories for 3 years and 3 attempts respectively.That is in order to balance the no of attempts and age of the candidates when the new pattern is implemented in 2011.
sme people just write some controversial bulshit over here and everyone comes with their swords and armours to fight wid dem. I hav got frnds who have got 100 pcentile or done stuff like dat. dey wont be bragging like dat here. getting 190+ is not a big deal 4 dem nd dat doesnt make dem super smart. its just dat dey have grown up munching up apti prblm. aptitude as it is asked in exams is not a test of iq at all. dese are just routine mechanical stuff dat one can master wid experience. and dat experience is biased towards sm kind of ppl. nd oders find it difficult to outdo dem in a year or two time.
The bottom line is the change needs to cm frm the institution. If dey need to check a limited level of apti, den dere should be a minimum cut off of say 130 in paper 2. dis score makes it clear dat the guy has a required level of apti. nd de qualifiers should be judged on the basis of paper 1 marks only as dat is what is true to the essence of a bureaucrat’s rquired knowledge.
Well the process of Paper 2 is a known process of testing Aptitude of people around the world and used in all the leading exams required for Managers be it CAT or GMAT or any other country. If it is routing mechanical stuff then it should not have been a issue. It is rather a test in limited time how is a person able to manage all the question. Civil Services is one of the biggest managerial job and giving aptitude importance is very scientific process. It is good that UPSC is focusing here along with taking right steps in mains like the new Paper V.
Your bragging attitude will create problems for yourself only. It is a very fair process of testing people on both knowledge and aptitude over the old process of selection low aptitude people with good knowledge who would frizzle out on aptitude. And what benchmark is 130 of a good Aptitude. Why not 160 or 170?
@grunge & jashan
See….this is an endless debate. Love it or hate it but we cannot ignore any of the papers ,aptitude or the GS part. They both are required…
By the way jashan, u said what benchmark is 130 !! why not 160-170. In that case what about the person who scored a perfect 200 within 110 minutes and was free for the next ten minutes in the examination hall. What score card will u use to reflect his excellence. He is grossly under-rewarded by the examination methodology. No method is infallible. What we need is a balance.
What I find intriguing is the logic of rewarding marks in the ratio of 1.2:1. This needs some serious explaining. And then you make it a competition between Goliaths and the Davids. Who are Goliaths ? Those who always knew that they are good at mathematics and Logics and hence they opted for maths stream in HSC. They studies a lot of Maths and practiced logic. They scored perfect 100 in maths and went on to become IITians (Or IISCian, NITian or any other good ‘XYZian’). Then, more often than not, these guys prepared for CAT, wrote CAT and became one more ‘ian’. Till now itās fine.
But what about the Davids who studied humanities and literature because they knew that the bend of their brains (And itās scientifically proven) was towards art, aesthetics and society. They deliberately opted out of sciences and read what they liked more. They never practiced Maths and never solved mechanical logic puzzles. These Davids are pitted against Goliaths with 2+4+2=8 years (HSC, Engineering, MBA…..not considering dropped years for preparation) of experience, training and practice behind them in an exam which is supposed to choose candidates for services in the social sector demanding high EQ and a greater sensitivity toward human behavior. Hell. Goliaths scored above 180 and davids fared somewhere between 125-135. Davids were killed in the very first stage.
Where is the equality? I donāt say that no humanity-guy clears this exam and all engineers find it a cakewalk but, still, parity is conspicuously absent. One can definitely prepare for aptitude but still he/she cannot achieve experience and comfort with the numbers like a guy who has been doing it since ages (and that too knowing that he is naturally good at that). And weightage is 1:1.2!!! Well, we remember. Gosh
Some of you would argue that social thinking and EQ will be tested in the mains. But, Davids are already killed. They are long dead. Their souls would not come to write mains exam. And thatās why Goliaths are enjoying cut offs as low as 700 point something (five point someone was still better) ;-)
Andā¦ā¦.. oh lord!! This is the very first stage of the exam. Davids did not even get a chance to display their weaponry.
Here I find this exam a little biased. It can be addressed. How to address….well thatās debatable. But it must be rationalized.
There is a solution. No one should study Humanities at school or college level. All should go for science subjects to have some kind of comfort while writing such aptitude exams later in their lives. Or Maths should be a compulsory subject to make these competitions more fair and square.
Maths & logics is a beautiful science. No denying to this fact. It should be criteria in the selection procedure. But its arrangement can be bettered…..can be modified. Its overdose is becoming an antidote against davids. Something must be done else thousands of Davids will be killed mercilessly in ‘apti’ exams be it UPSC, SSC, Bank, State PSC or any other exam.
Mechanical logic is good. A programmed computer/ robot can defeat Vishwanathan Anand in chess but ask the same robot to play Ludo with a five year kid.
Apti, apti, apti……………I bet warren buffet and Amartya Sen would not be able to clear these so called ‘apti’ exams with the kind of arrangement UPSC or any other exam is following or the kind of exceptional scores they are looking for.
Reward natural aptitude. But, Why to be biases in favor of gene-backed neurologically tuned brains, practiced logic, and numerical comfort due to long drawn out experience. Or, corollarily, why to punish naturally not-so-tuned brains, non practice of conventional logic and deliberate negation of any long-drawn experience in numbers to pursue some other more beautiful areas of human intellectual quest.
Just imagine if the process is reversed. Mains become pre and pre become mains. āAptiā gods will eat the dust. Not all but most of them. Well read guys will still make but quick fire sloggers will be out. Goliaths will not enter the arena for the want of practice. They love apti because they already have 175+ locked-in on their score cards.
But I donāt favor this undue advantage to anyone. No way.
By the way, IIM-A has decided to lower the intake of engineers (So called maths and logic gods). Is UPSC listening?
Nothing against engineers. I love them. Itās about the aptitude thing.
Final verdict……….keep it but balance it!!
no way it is a genuine apti test… just see the level of maths nd comprehension that they ask? it is a freaking insult to the concept of aptitude even. just having 80 silly questions and putting them in a 2 hr tst makes it simply a time bound race. and dAts where it becomes biased? tomorrow if iam asked to compete against a ma english frm jnu and given 6 to 8 months to do so, i will never stand a chance, come what may..dats foo what happens to a humanities student who is asked to compete aginst sm iitian or watever in a timebound test which is any iitians’ food and fodder, their core competency.
things will be entirely different in paper 4 of gs bcoz den the machanization of csat will be nipped in the bud nd wat wll be needed is GENUINE INTUITION.
@Abhishek Yadav. Your way of arguing is superb. What’s more, the points raised by you are completely valid and highly convincing. Hats off to you! India certainly needs more & more civil servants with hearts of gold and not just with sword-sharp minds. We need administrators who understand the social milieu & the historical setting in which they would be working, who can form their opinions on vital issues(& not just solve mathematical puzzles!), who can empathize with the daily hardships of our ruralfolk and can communicate with our vast masses in one or more of India’s own vernacular tongues, and OF COURSE, with a REASONABLE level of that highly-priced ‘aptitude’. They must be able to deal with governance issues sympathetically, with a humanitarian perspective, and not mechanically. This vast and diverse country shouldn’t risk having only the city-bred, only English-knowing, aptitude-loving nerds as public servants. Civil services require not only people with good brains but also with good hearts. But in the present structure of CS exam, with sky-rocketing Prelims cut-offs, there does not seem to be a parity. God knows where we are headed!
@ abhishek, ravi – awesome articulation…completely agree with both of u and grunge…
god knows whether upsc is even slightly affected by all this…
@ Ravi and anonymous
Thanx bro. And yes, Ravi, Ur articulation and logic is much superior to mine. Keep up the gud work!!
Hello Abshiek,
I read your arguments and i am in complete agreement with your pain and the feeling of biaseness that Upsc has inflicted this year of 2013, for the humanities and social science background student. Infact you are not alone in this kind of feeling for i have scores of friends from social sciences who attempted preliminary 2013 and they feel resentful towards upsc’s pattern of aptitude paper for the year 2013, It is very clear from the paper that social science students do not stand a chance of competing with the science wizards. If UPSC continues like this then it is a very big ploy on the part of upsc to deprive students from humanities and social science background to throw them out even before the real exam takes plac . They have to make the exam fair. This is our right, the right to equality.
At this stage let me also make it clear that the humanities background students are not going to take this silently. In fact we are waiting for the exam process to get over after which we can file an RTI about the number of students who qualified pt with different backgrounds and are going to high court against Upsc,s biased attitude. Here i would also request Mrunal to please support us in our fight and struggle. In fact it is surprising that Hindi students were able to fight Upsc against the introduction of compulsory English. Similarly the regional language students were also successful against Upsc,s attempt at scuttling the language paper optional. Now it is only the humanities and social science background students who have been left in the lurch. We need to fight this injustice perpetuated by DP Aggrawal and his double speak, who wanted to remove the coaching industry but to the contrary look what has happened. Now students are paying one lakh rupee’s for coaching and the introduction of aptitude has made several other blood suckers like Time, Carrer Launcher, Byju, bla bla to set up their blood sucking industry over our parents hard earned money. In fact what we are seeing is the MBAisation of Upsc and in all this murky muck, DP Agrawall is hand in glove with the coaching industry.
Keeping the above scenario in background, i would urge all the humanities and social science background students to organize themselves for their rightful rights and let us fight together after the exam process is over and bring the bluff of upsc,s biased face to the long arms of justice. In fact i have already started organizing some students for the cause and would like all the interested students to organize themselves and give a call for united fight. Those students who want to join the movement can contact me through my email at, ignitesonuxavier@gmail.com and i would also like to meet students who are already working in this regard like Abshiek. good luck!
ignitesonu, ignitesonuxavier@gmail.com
Hi,
Had a job in an MNC but resigned.One of my friends suggested this site and i came, so amazing .So inspirational, for people like us who does self study always
So anyone please tell me how do you prepare disaster management and ecology ? it will be a great help to me
finally all the best to everyone and thanks in advance
the cutoff was 238. The counsellor at vajiram told me. Someone from upsc told them.
sorry,not clear at first time……..bt next time wll be improve….
provide preparation plan for ssc
@neena mrunal sir bhi insaan hain!uney bhi khana chahiye!agar app uney khana de rahe ho to wo blog likhna bandh to nai karne vale!logo ke ache qualities lena shuru karo!rather than criticizing
Hi guys ur suggestions plzzzzzzzzzz………
I m preparing since last 2 yrs cleared cse pre in 2nd attempt………..
But i m totally puzzled and preplexed bcz syllabus is so wide and no previous writing practice…….
Unfortunately buckled under pressure….help plzzzzz
sir, what is cut off marks for civil service pre exam 2013.
Sir my roll no is 627460 plz tell me am i in any list whether ias or ifs
please could you find my number 417141
hi
hi, i have lost my roll no. but have my registration id. can u pleaseee help me with knowing my results?
Can anyone please tell me what will happen in below case:-
Anyone filing IPS as his 2nd pref, not get selected for 1st preference and declared medically/physically unfit in medical/physical test for IPS(2nd preference). Then will he be considered for his 3rd preference or will be out(as is the case in SSC).
Please share only genuine information.
Thanks in advance…..
Read this extra and fairly IMPORTANT provision in DAF instructions provided by UPSC.
28. Candidates should note that instead of separate
Question Paper and answer book, a consolidated
Question Paper-cum-Answerbook, having space below
each part/sub part of a question shall be provided to
them for writing the answers. Candidates shall be
required to attempt answer to the part/sub-part of a
question strictly within the pre-defined space. Any
attempt outside the pre-defined space shall not be
evaluated.
Hi neha,I m Bandita from Assam.I will be sitting in IAS prelims first time in 2014.Can you be able to guide me for prelims 2014?
My email id is : bandita_das1@rediffmail.com
is there the question paper of upsc prelim exam in both language of hindi and english ???? i ask from 2013
hi kishore sir,
u can download all previous years prelims and mains question paper from http://www.upsc.gov.on which is official site of UPSC.
Thank u so much sir…!
Sir Please help in filling the service preference as i was unable to get proper guidance on that issue.
hi,
i have doubtin my age eligibility,my bate of birth is 20/08/1983,i had attempeted 2013prelims but i hd not cleared, i belong to caste FC, my doubt is is it possible for me to apply for 2014prelims,because my date of birth is 20th august….. kindly help me on this
sir i have lost my roll no please help me the above link is also not working
my reg id is 11312865369
dob 14/06/1991
ph:8097880749
sir please help me sir i m in a big mess…
I lost my roll no plz way find the my roll no… thanx
i want to know how much score i had secured in my prelims(2013) so that i can make it over the next time i appear(my regid:11315339713)
waiting for ur response
how can i get marks obtained in prelims .
plzzz help
sorry miss swati , its upto UPSC and not in yr hand as UPSE reveals the marks after whole process of CSE 2013 get completed. so till that u hv to wait …..
i m not toally convinced to most of guys. i think if sciece student get benefitted from CSAT paper then on other hand humanities oriented student get benefit frn G S mains syllabus. so take it in positive way dudes and u will find it easy that CSAT is not so diffcult for humanities stuedent . i think it is good and balanced approach by UPSC. BEST OF LUCK …..
please tell me the cut off marks of pre exam 2013
dear sir i have lost my roll no.my dob-14-07-1988 and my regd no is-11312222943..plz sens my roll no to my email..