- 3 Types of Judgments
- 3 Areas in Study of Ethics
- 3 Preconditions for Ethical Scrutiny
- Case study: Memento
- Case Study: Crank
- This article series based on Ethics Lectures by Mr.Kavan Limbasiya (AIR-198, IRS-IT) at SPIPA, Ahmedabad
- The Syllabus of UPSC General Studies Paper-4 Ethics is available here click me. Accordingly, we can divide the Ethics topic into 8 parts
- First part would be Ethics and Human interface- further subdivided into three articles
- E1/P1: Types of Judgments, Pre-requisite for Ethical scrutiny, Meta Ethics, Applied ethics, Normative-Descriptive ethics.
- E1/P2: Theories of Ethics: virtual ethics, deontological vs. teleological ethics, utilitarianism, hedonism, epicureanism, egoism, conduct ethics etc.
- E1/P3: Values, Role of family-society-educational institutions in inculcating values, ethics and private and public relationships.
3 Types of Judgments
Question: Are these three judgments inter-related?
- Traditional thinkers considered them one and same i.e. what is ‘true’ (factual) is ‘beautiful’ (aesthetic) and therefore it is Good (moral). Something like Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram.
- They believed, just as facts are not ‘dependent’ on us, the morals are not dependent on us. The morals are created by the God.
- Now we don’t see things in the same manner. Consider following question: Was Amitabh involved in Bofors case? (Factual judgment)
- If you’re a bigB fan, you’d say “no he can’t be involved because he is a ‘good’ guy (Moral judgment). And you’d say this without verifying the facts. So, you’ve internal inconsistency- you like this guy, so you can’t believe he can be bad.
- Similar case about Sanjay Dutt’s involvement in 1992 bomb blasts.
3 Areas in Study of Ethics
The study of Ethics is subdivided into three areas: (1) Meta Ethics (2) Applied (3) Normative Ethics
S1:Meta-Ethics / Critical Ethics
- If we steal, is it “good” thing? That is an example of ethical question.
- What is “good”? That is meta-ethical question. In other words, Meta-ethics is one ‘step’ above ethics.
- If you begin evaluating the ethics itself, then it’s meta-ethics.
- Nature=> philosophy of nature => physics.
- Similarly here morality =>ethics => meta-ethics.
S2: Applied Ethics
- In subsequent lecture, we’ll discuss various theories of ethics. One such theory is Utilitarianism, which says if a decision leads to “maximum happiness for maximum people” then it’s an ethical decision.
- Now if we apply this utilitarianism theory to a specific field, then it’d become “Applied Ethics” examples,
|Bioethics||step cell therapy is good or bad?|
|Environmental ethics||cutting trees and displacing the tribal for highway projects is good or bad?|
S3: Normative vs. Descriptive Ethics
|Descriptive||Normative / prescriptive|
|Einstein’s equation is E=MC2||Should we use that equation or knowledge to build nuclear weapon?|
|Newton’s third law: action and reaction are opposite.||Should we use Newton’s third law to build a rocket or a gun?|
|It describes “this is what’s happening.”||It prescribes “what should be done or what ought to be done.”|
|As you can see, only ‘describing’, rather than prescribing.||
Ethics vs. Morality?
- Subject matter of Physics = Natural phenomenon. It studies nature and derives formulas.
- So subject matter “nature”=> its study is called “physics”.
- Same way subject matter “morality” => its study is called “ethics”.
Legality vs. Morality
|Gay marriage is illegal||Perhaps in some ethical school of thought, gay marriage could be considered ethical because everyone has ‘right’ to have a life partner to provide him/her emotional support.|
|Every illegal thing may not be immoral||Every moral things may not be legal. If we make ‘lying’ illegal, then everyone will be jailed.|
|One and same throughout the region/nation||Varies from culture, religion and region.|
|Murder is illegal||Murder is immoral so its in the ‘intersecting’ region of legality and morality.|
3 Preconditions for Ethical Scrutiny
For case studies- Before we can decide where an action is worth ethical debate or not, you should first ‘test’ whether given case passes 3-preconditions or not?
Pc1: Free Will
- In Delhi zoo, a mentally instable person falls in Tiger enclosure. The white tiger kills him, while the crowd is busy capturing the MMS video of the event.
- If a person has multiple choices, and freedom to pick one within those choices, only then we can debate it on ethical ground.
- When that white tiger killed the mentally instable man, Tiger didn’t have ‘free will’ or ‘knowledge’. Nature has designed tiger to act that way. Hence tiger’s action can’t be judged as ethical or immoral. He can’t /shouldn’t be punished for that.
- While crowd’s action can be termed as unethical- because they had ‘free will’: Option A- help the person or option B- record MMS on mobile. They chose option A, hence unethical.
- A Child takes “iphone 6s plus” from table and dips it in a fishbowl. Phone is permanently damaged. Was Child’s action unethical?
- Well, Child had ‘free will’- (A) Take selfi and upload on facebook (B) dip it in a fishbowl
- She chose optionB. But she didn’t have the ‘knowledge’ that iPhone are not waterproof.
- We cannot exercise ‘free will’ in an ethical/unethical manner, unless and until we have ‘knowledge’ of its consequence. Hence baby’s action can’t be termed as ethical or unethical.
Pc3: Voluntary Action
- If someone puts a gun on your head or straps a bomb on your waist and then orders you to commit a crime, then ‘it’s an involuntary action’ by you, hence we can’t judge it on ethical grounds.
- Apart from above three, following conditions also make it difficult to evaluate an action on ethical grounds:
|Fear / violence||
Now you can see the broad picture- consider following Case: Mr.X murders Mr.Y to acquire his property.
|He killed Mr.Y||Human Action. (Recall 3 types of assumptions: if he had done with out free will, knowledge and voluntary action, we’d have called it “non-human” action and topic would end here.|
|Mr.X’s action is morally wrong.||Moral Judgment. (Recall 3-types of Judgments-factual, aesthetic and moral)|
|It is wrong to murder another human||Moral Standard=> Ethics => Meta-Ethics.|
|No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.||Article 21, Constitution of India|
|Whoever commits murder shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.||Section 302, Indian Penal Code (IPC)|
Case study: Memento
In the movie “Memento”, the protagonist- Mr. Leonard Shelby suffers from short-term memory loss. Following people take advantage of his mental conditions:
- A waitress: by making the protagonistkill her abusive boyfriend after court and police fails to give her protection or justice.
- A Cop: by making the protagonist kill various criminals for cleansing the society as well as looting the money from dead corpses. He uses this money to tip-off informants and fight against crime.
- A motel-receptionist: by charging the protagonist multiple rooms not used by him, because receptionist’s boss had ordered him to increase revenue by doing so, else threatened to fire him from job. This receptionist has a daughter for marriage and a son in expensive coaching at Delhi/Kota so he can’t afford to lose job.
In above case, whose action(s) is/are subject to ethical scrutiny? If yes, then are they ethical or unethical?
- Leonard Shelby
- Motel receptionist
Case Study: Crank
In the movie “Crank”, Chinese Mobsters inject our protagonist Jason Statham with a synthetic drug which inhibits the flow of adrenaline, slowing the heart and eventually killing the victim. Jason enters a hospital trying to explain his condition to staff but nurses refuse to believe him and doctor says he’d need to run 24 hours medical tests before giving him any drug, despite repeated requests by Jason that he requires immediate shot of Adrenaline. Impatient Jason breaks into the storeroom and tries to steal vials containing synthetic adrenaline, so he can inject them to survive. But the staff and policemen try to apprehend him. Jason fights back, injures a few of them before escaping the hospital. In above case, whose action(s) is/are subject to ethical scrutiny? If yes, then are they ethical or unethical?
- Jason Statham
In the next part (E1/P2) we’ll look at various theories of Ethics. Visit Mrunal.org/Ethics for more study material on Ethics.
MEMENTO CASE STUDY:
1. Actions of LEONARD SHELBY was Illegal but cannot be termed as Ethical/Unethical becoz he is unable to act on his “FREE WILL” becoz of his Mental State coupled with the lack of knowledge(add info: in the movie he doesnt knw his wife’s killer)
2. Actions of the WAITRESS is illegal as well as Unethical becoz her purpose to kill her boyfriend is revenge but not for self defence.
3. Actions of the COP may be subject to Legal Scrutiny(if whether the criminals deserved to die) but Unethical becoz he took advantage of Leonard’s mental condition without consulting his counterparts.
4. The Actions of MOTEL RECEPTIONIST is ILLEGAL but Subject to Ethical Scrutiny( did he do it out of pressure/fear of losing his job or futher wanted to fill his pocket)
Waitress need ethical scrutiny: She was under threat from her abusive boyfriend, and the legal machinery was a failure.
i think actions of cop are illegal (this would come under extra judicial killings, only the law of the land has the right to decide whether one deserves death penalty or not) but subject to ethical scrutiny, because he is trying to fight against crimes.
1. LEONARD SHELBY – No free will ; no knowledge. Hence can’t be termed as ethical or unethical. But it’s illegal.
2. Waitress – No free will ; as the only option left with her for her safety after the failure of Police and justice is to use the mental person. Hence can’t be termed as ethical or unethical. Her action are illegal, as she is involved in crime.
3. Cop – free will + knowledge ; hence unethical . illegal , as he is involved in crime.
4. Receptionist – It can’t be termed as Involuntary action as he can find another job. Hence, his action both unethical and illegal.
(Applied Ethics )as per Utilitarianism theory, which says if a decision leads to “maximum happiness for maximum people” then it’s an ethical decision. COP Ethical
But it can not be made a universal act it will lead to disorganisation in the society and in long run there will me more professional killers, hired for killing targeted persons based on their own judgement and perception.
Tnq so much for this crisp yet effective explanation I thought of the same arguments.
excellent stuff,well put
Thanks a ton Mrunal Sir, for saving my Dad’s hard earned money :) :)
How can murder be intersecting region of legality and morality?.it should be intersecting region of illegality and immorality.because murder cannot be legal and moral?.
thank you sir…
it is very use full…
Tiger example awesome… I remembered Einstein “If you can’t put it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.”
Smile on my face when reading the examples… :-)
Can you please upload the lectures on youtube sir.
What is your Message? Search before asking questions & confine discussions to exams related matter only. sir plz tell when will ssc chsl exam conduct???
sir plz tell when will ssc
chsl exam conduct???
Please upload video lacture of ethics E1 series. It will really helpful me for GPSC main exam
The concepts given above are too easy to understand with vivid examples. Thank you!
Can you please upload the written material of E4 and E5 lectures here its showing material till E3
Waiting for reply
Thanks & Regards
Mrunal sir, please provide the video of lectures E1/P1 P2 P3
Leonardo Shelby : As he is suffering from short term memory loss, he lacks free will, knowledge and used by others for their works to be done – he is beyond ethical scrutiny, but killing humans is illegal and it is non human action.
A waitress : Her actions were illegal. she tried the options of court and police, lastly it is her or her abusive boyfriend – No option – No free will. But she have the knowledge of Consequences. her behavior would go under ethical scrutiny – Mostly Unethical, because she deliberately used another persons’s disability and she didn’t kill her boyfriend because of the fear of conviction. she might have thought that even police found Shelby they would end up knowing his mental disability, case will not come up to me- Unethical.
A cop : Illegal and unethical. Cleansing the society is not the job of a mentally disabled person. As a cop he has free will, knowledge and every means, he could try other way. he is a cop not a Robin hood. He must to the job in his limits created by the rules and regulations.
A motel receptionist : illegal and unethical. She have free will and Knowledge, u cannot term it as involuntary. if any one say the conditions of boss makes a person involuntary, in real life, we face such type of situations at every step. But we shouldn’t try to take the least resistant path through means of exploitation of other people- Completely Unethical.
Jason Statham – Illegal – there is a procedure and decorum in hospitals, but considering the emergency of Jason, we feel Sympathetic to him , and say it is his life or death question. But Nurses and Doctors doesn’t know this. They might thought him as a mentally disabled person. Any way he lacks free will, even if had knowledge of consequences, he has no option.
Nurses – no ethical scrutiny required. they did what their job was. any person cannot go or give anything without the order of his superior doctor.
Doctor : no ethical scrutiny required. they didn’t know what happened to jason, and jason have no time to tell them. they might thought him as a mentally disabled person. how can doctor give anything to patient without performing basic medical tests?
Bro what about policemen
Excellent structure for ethics paper, with parallel reading from wiki will help us to score good
I wish, sir u should do this for all optional paper as well…
My quest for ethics ends here thanku so mush mrunal sir . One can easily score good marks by reading only this site
Hello I am Manish just complicated graduation and self preparation for upsc cse2017 exam. Need a serious and honest friend for preparation together
sir I wants notes of ur study material of offline method if possible
and also suggest ur mobile apps (if any)
I found that it will great help to as I am unable to join coaching classes for the that……….
god blessed u sir for ur comparative online study material and helping nature…
Jason stathem :No Freewill since he doesnot left with any option =>Not comes under ethical scrutiny
Nurses: No Knowledge =>Not comes under ethical scrutiny
Doctors : No freewill and knowledge =>Not comes under ethical scrutiny
Policemen : voluntary action to stop Jason from damaging the Infra and to control him =>Not comes under ethical scrutiny
All videos are there already……
You are a legendary Guide for all Civil service aspirants …
thanx heartly……..Farooque Malegaon
Dear sir … i belong from urdu medium
History opt…..language of answer is urdu
plz suggest study material for me…..
Sir please share the link for video ,part E1 is not available on you tube
plz provide answers of case studies.
sir please upload ethics E1 Series on YouTube
Isn’t voluntary action a subset of free will ?
For example – If the MOTEL RECEPTIONIST had a free will to get the extra money from any other source ( let’s just say he was an UBER driver from 8 to 10 after her motel services) then it would have been unethical on her part because he had a free will to choose the option of not using Leonardo, but since she didn’t have any other option to get money in time she used him and she didn’t have her free will which leads to involuntary action. ( we have to scrutinize under the current circumstances) hence ethical.
On the contrary for the cop – He had a free will and had 2 options – 1. Arrest (ethical) 2. Kill (unethical in terms of human rights), even though the purpose for killing according to the cop’s meta ethics was right but on the other side of coin he had the option of arresting the culprits under the ethnicity of human rights. He chose the latter one and hence it was his voluntary action which made his action unethical.
Can we say that free will is the broader aspect which covers the voluntary action of a person to determine ethnicity ?
Both the waitress and the cop are subject to ethical scrutiny because the waitress had her selfish motives and the cop do not have the authority to decide the punishment for the criminals.
sir kindly share the answers so that we can self evaluate and learn from our mistakes.